Slide
Centre Interdisciplinaire
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
1.
Parent, G.; Robitaille, M. -P.; Guay, J. -P.
In: Sexologies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2018, ISSN: 11581360, (Publisher: Elsevier Masson s.r.l.).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, aggression, American, article, female, heterosexuality, human, male, reproduction, sexual abuse, sexual coercion, speech, structural equation modeling, Thinking, university student
@article{parent_sexual_2018,
title = {Sexual coercion perpetrated by women: Reproduction of an etiological model [La coercition sexuelle perpétrée par la femme: mise à l’épreuve d'un modèle étiologique]},
author = {G. Parent and M. -P. Robitaille and J. -P. Guay},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042430184&doi=10.1016%2fj.sexol.2018.02.007&partnerID=40&md5=c25b6dbf63ee22146ddc146ffc0bd4c0},
doi = {10.1016/j.sexol.2018.02.007},
issn = {11581360},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Sexologies},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {113–121},
abstract = {Introduction: Although an increasing body of literature focuses on sexual coercion committed by women in the general population, very few explanatory models have been put forward to explain the use of coercive strategies by women. Objective: The main objective of this study is to test, using a wider and more culturally diverse sample, the first explanatory model suggested by Schatzel-Murphy (2011) and tested on American women. Method: To this end, 274 Canadian, heterosexual and French-speaking university students completed the French version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA). Results: The results show that a greater proportion of Quebeckers (41%) than Americans (26%) use sexual coercion to force their partner to have sexual relations. In general, the Schatzel-Murphy etiological model successfully explains Quebeckers’ use of sexual coercion, albeit not quite as well as for Americans, as can be seen by an explained variance which is three times smaller (12% as opposed to 34%). The lack of link between sexual abuse and sexual coercion, together with the different roles played by sociosexuality and hyperfemininity in the use of sexual coercion by Quebeckers, is discussed in light of the cultural differences between women from the two countries. Discussion: Some thought is also given to the two major paths leading to sexual coercion and suggestions are made for related clinical implications. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Masson s.r.l.},
keywords = {adult, aggression, American, article, female, heterosexuality, human, male, reproduction, sexual abuse, sexual coercion, speech, structural equation modeling, Thinking, university student},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: Although an increasing body of literature focuses on sexual coercion committed by women in the general population, very few explanatory models have been put forward to explain the use of coercive strategies by women. Objective: The main objective of this study is to test, using a wider and more culturally diverse sample, the first explanatory model suggested by Schatzel-Murphy (2011) and tested on American women. Method: To this end, 274 Canadian, heterosexual and French-speaking university students completed the French version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA). Results: The results show that a greater proportion of Quebeckers (41%) than Americans (26%) use sexual coercion to force their partner to have sexual relations. In general, the Schatzel-Murphy etiological model successfully explains Quebeckers’ use of sexual coercion, albeit not quite as well as for Americans, as can be seen by an explained variance which is three times smaller (12% as opposed to 34%). The lack of link between sexual abuse and sexual coercion, together with the different roles played by sociosexuality and hyperfemininity in the use of sexual coercion by Quebeckers, is discussed in light of the cultural differences between women from the two countries. Discussion: Some thought is also given to the two major paths leading to sexual coercion and suggestions are made for related clinical implications. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS
2.
Parent, G.; Robitaille, M. -P.; Guay, J. -P.
Sexual coercion perpetrated by women: Testing an etiological model Journal Article
In: Sexologies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. e39–e44, 2018, ISSN: 11581360, (Publisher: Elsevier Masson s.r.l.).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, aggression, American, article, female, heterosexuality, human, male, sexual abuse, sexual coercion, speech, structural equation modeling, Thinking, university student
@article{parent_sexual_2018-1,
title = {Sexual coercion perpetrated by women: Testing an etiological model},
author = {G. Parent and M. -P. Robitaille and J. -P. Guay},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042350644&doi=10.1016%2fj.sexol.2018.02.008&partnerID=40&md5=31fcfd8539f77390d4ca320ff58e5b51},
doi = {10.1016/j.sexol.2018.02.008},
issn = {11581360},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Sexologies},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {e39–e44},
abstract = {Introduction: Although an increasing body of literature focuses on sexual coercion committed by women in the general population, very few explanatory models have been put forward to explain the use of coercive strategies by women. Objective: The main objective of this study is to test, using a wider and more culturally diverse sample, the first explanatory model suggested by Schatzel-Murphy (2011) and tested on American women. Method: To this end, 274 Canadian, heterosexual and French-speaking university students completed the French version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA). Results: The results show that a greater proportion of Quebeckers (41%) than Americans (26%) use sexual coercion to force their partner to have sexual contacts. In general, the Schatzel-Murphy etiological model successfully explains Quebeckers’ use of sexual coercion, albeit not quite as well as for Americans, as can be seen by an explained variance which is three times smaller (12% as opposed to 34%). The lack of link between sexual abuse and sexual coercion, together with the different roles played by sociosexuality and hyperfemininity in the use of sexual coercion by Quebeckers, is discussed in light of the cultural differences between women from the two countries. Discussion: Some thought is also given to the two major paths leading to sexual coercion and suggestions are made for related clinical implications. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Masson s.r.l.},
keywords = {adult, aggression, American, article, female, heterosexuality, human, male, sexual abuse, sexual coercion, speech, structural equation modeling, Thinking, university student},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Introduction: Although an increasing body of literature focuses on sexual coercion committed by women in the general population, very few explanatory models have been put forward to explain the use of coercive strategies by women. Objective: The main objective of this study is to test, using a wider and more culturally diverse sample, the first explanatory model suggested by Schatzel-Murphy (2011) and tested on American women. Method: To this end, 274 Canadian, heterosexual and French-speaking university students completed the French version of the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA). Results: The results show that a greater proportion of Quebeckers (41%) than Americans (26%) use sexual coercion to force their partner to have sexual contacts. In general, the Schatzel-Murphy etiological model successfully explains Quebeckers’ use of sexual coercion, albeit not quite as well as for Americans, as can be seen by an explained variance which is three times smaller (12% as opposed to 34%). The lack of link between sexual abuse and sexual coercion, together with the different roles played by sociosexuality and hyperfemininity in the use of sexual coercion by Quebeckers, is discussed in light of the cultural differences between women from the two countries. Discussion: Some thought is also given to the two major paths leading to sexual coercion and suggestions are made for related clinical implications. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS
3.
Fontaine, N. M. G.; Parent, G.; Guay, J. -P.
Female sexual coercion examined from a developmental criminology perspective Journal Article
In: Sexologies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. e45–e50, 2018, ISSN: 11581360, (Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adolescence, adult, aggression, article, assessment of humans, Childhood, conceptual framework, controlled study, criminology, female, heterosexuality, human, medical history, multidimensional inventory of development, problem behavior, psychological aspect, sex and aggression, sexual coercion, theoretical model, university student
@article{fontaine_female_2018,
title = {Female sexual coercion examined from a developmental criminology perspective},
author = {N. M. G. Fontaine and G. Parent and J. -P. Guay},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044569861&doi=10.1016%2fj.sexol.2018.02.012&partnerID=40&md5=bb95e8a12e7ea59bc3b4028455e0ec5e},
doi = {10.1016/j.sexol.2018.02.012},
issn = {11581360},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Sexologies},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {e45–e50},
abstract = {Based on the developmental criminology perspective, this study examines the association between the history of behaviour problems in childhood and adolescence and the use of sexually coercive behaviours by women. Sexual coercion refers to the use of strategies, which can be sometimes subtle, to have sexual contact without the consent of a partner (i.e., seduction, manipulation, intoxication and physical force). In addition, this study examines the association between the use of sexual coercion and physical aggression (e.g., hitting a partner with an object, pushing or shoving) and psychological aggression (e.g., yelling at a partner, keeping him from seeing friends) toward their actual partner (or their last partner) during a disagreement to document different coercive behaviours used by women. The data were collected from a sample of female heterosexual university students (n = 274; mean age, 22.9 years). The participants completed the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA; Knight, 2007). The findings suggest that women who had behaviour problems in childhood and adolescence tend to use sexual coercion to a greater extent than women without a history of behaviour problems. Moreover, the findings suggest that women who use sexual coercion are also prone to resort to psychological aggression toward a partner during a disagreement. These findings highlight the importance of taking into account the history of behaviour problems across the life-course in the development of theoretical models of female sexual coercion. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS},
keywords = {adolescence, adult, aggression, article, assessment of humans, Childhood, conceptual framework, controlled study, criminology, female, heterosexuality, human, medical history, multidimensional inventory of development, problem behavior, psychological aspect, sex and aggression, sexual coercion, theoretical model, university student},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Based on the developmental criminology perspective, this study examines the association between the history of behaviour problems in childhood and adolescence and the use of sexually coercive behaviours by women. Sexual coercion refers to the use of strategies, which can be sometimes subtle, to have sexual contact without the consent of a partner (i.e., seduction, manipulation, intoxication and physical force). In addition, this study examines the association between the use of sexual coercion and physical aggression (e.g., hitting a partner with an object, pushing or shoving) and psychological aggression (e.g., yelling at a partner, keeping him from seeing friends) toward their actual partner (or their last partner) during a disagreement to document different coercive behaviours used by women. The data were collected from a sample of female heterosexual university students (n = 274; mean age, 22.9 years). The participants completed the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA; Knight, 2007). The findings suggest that women who had behaviour problems in childhood and adolescence tend to use sexual coercion to a greater extent than women without a history of behaviour problems. Moreover, the findings suggest that women who use sexual coercion are also prone to resort to psychological aggression toward a partner during a disagreement. These findings highlight the importance of taking into account the history of behaviour problems across the life-course in the development of theoretical models of female sexual coercion. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS
4.
Fontaine, N. M. G.; Parent, G.; Guay, J. -P.
In: Sexologies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 122–130, 2018, ISSN: 11581360, (Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, aggression, article, criminology, female, heterosexual female, human, major clinical study, problem behavior, psychologic assessment, sample, sexual coercion, theoretical model, university student
@article{fontaine_female_2018-1,
title = {Female sexual coercion examined from a developmental criminology perspective [Les comportements de coercition sexuelle commis par les femmes examinés sous l'approche de la criminologie développementale]},
author = {N. M. G. Fontaine and G. Parent and J. -P. Guay},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044608864&doi=10.1016%2fj.sexol.2018.02.011&partnerID=40&md5=3beb2aad54b87a6133c69bb57df7ec7c},
doi = {10.1016/j.sexol.2018.02.011},
issn = {11581360},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Sexologies},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {122–130},
abstract = {Objectives: Based on the developmental criminology perspective, this study examines the association between the history of behavior problems in childhood and adolescence and the use of sexually coercive behaviors by women (seduction, manipulation, intoxication and physical force). In addition, this study examines the association between the use of sexual coercion and physical aggression (e.g., hitting a partner with an object, pushing or shoving) and psychological aggression (e.g., yelling at a partner, keeping him from seeing friends) toward their actual partner (or their last partner) during a disagreement to document different coercive behaviors used by women. Method: The data were collected from a sample of female heterosexual university students (n = 274; mean age, 22.9 years). The participants completed the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA; Knight, 2007). Results: The findings suggest that women who had behavior problems in childhood and adolescence tend to use sexual coercion to a greater extent than women without a history of behavior problems. Moreover, the findings suggest that women who use sexual coercion are also prone to resort to psychological aggression toward a partner during a disagreement. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of taking into account the history of behavior problems across the life-course in the development of theoretical models of female sexual coercion. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS},
keywords = {adult, aggression, article, criminology, female, heterosexual female, human, major clinical study, problem behavior, psychologic assessment, sample, sexual coercion, theoretical model, university student},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Objectives: Based on the developmental criminology perspective, this study examines the association between the history of behavior problems in childhood and adolescence and the use of sexually coercive behaviors by women (seduction, manipulation, intoxication and physical force). In addition, this study examines the association between the use of sexual coercion and physical aggression (e.g., hitting a partner with an object, pushing or shoving) and psychological aggression (e.g., yelling at a partner, keeping him from seeing friends) toward their actual partner (or their last partner) during a disagreement to document different coercive behaviors used by women. Method: The data were collected from a sample of female heterosexual university students (n = 274; mean age, 22.9 years). The participants completed the Multidimensional Inventory of Development, Sex and Aggression (MIDSA; Knight, 2007). Results: The findings suggest that women who had behavior problems in childhood and adolescence tend to use sexual coercion to a greater extent than women without a history of behavior problems. Moreover, the findings suggest that women who use sexual coercion are also prone to resort to psychological aggression toward a partner during a disagreement. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of taking into account the history of behavior problems across the life-course in the development of theoretical models of female sexual coercion. © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS