Slide
Centre Interdisciplinaire
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
1.
Lapointe, J. -F.; Molyneaux, H.; Allili, M. S.
A Literature Review of AR-Based Remote Guidance Tasks with User Studies Journal Article
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 12191 LNCS, pp. 111–120, 2020, ISSN: 03029743, (ISBN: 9783030496975 Publisher: Springer).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, Efficiency, Future of works, Human computer interaction, Immersive environment, Literature reviews, Mixed reality, Remote collaboration, Remote guidance, Smartphones, systematic review, Technical requirement, Technical support
@article{lapointe_literature_2020,
title = {A Literature Review of AR-Based Remote Guidance Tasks with User Studies},
author = {J. -F. Lapointe and H. Molyneaux and M. S. Allili},
editor = {Fragomeni G. Chen J.Y.C.},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089165019&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-49698-2_8&partnerID=40&md5=7af5345630a6dc4fc14e46a4ee1b1fdc},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-49698-2_8},
issn = {03029743},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
volume = {12191 LNCS},
pages = {111–120},
abstract = {The future of work is increasingly mobile and distributed across space and time. Institutions and individuals are phasing out desktops in favor of laptops, tablets and/or smart phones as much work (assessment, technical support, etc.) is done in the field and not at a desk. There will be a need for systems that support remote collaborations such as remote guidance. Augmented reality (AR) is praised for its ability to show the task at hand within an immersive environment, allowing for spatial clarity and greater efficiency, thereby showing great promise for collaborative and remote guidance tasks; however, there are no systematic reviews of AR based remote guidance systems. This paper reviews the literature describing AR-based remote guidance tasks and discusses the task settings, technical requirements and user groups within the literature, followed by a discussion of further areas of interest for the application of this technology combined with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to increase the efficiency of applied tasks. © 2020, NRC Canada.},
note = {ISBN: 9783030496975
Publisher: Springer},
keywords = {Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, Efficiency, Future of works, Human computer interaction, Immersive environment, Literature reviews, Mixed reality, Remote collaboration, Remote guidance, Smartphones, systematic review, Technical requirement, Technical support},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The future of work is increasingly mobile and distributed across space and time. Institutions and individuals are phasing out desktops in favor of laptops, tablets and/or smart phones as much work (assessment, technical support, etc.) is done in the field and not at a desk. There will be a need for systems that support remote collaborations such as remote guidance. Augmented reality (AR) is praised for its ability to show the task at hand within an immersive environment, allowing for spatial clarity and greater efficiency, thereby showing great promise for collaborative and remote guidance tasks; however, there are no systematic reviews of AR based remote guidance systems. This paper reviews the literature describing AR-based remote guidance tasks and discusses the task settings, technical requirements and user groups within the literature, followed by a discussion of further areas of interest for the application of this technology combined with artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to increase the efficiency of applied tasks. © 2020, NRC Canada.
2.
Jazouli, A.; Koplyay, T. M.; Mitchell, B.; Motaghi, H.
The rise of complexity due to stakeholders structure along the lifecycle in project management organizations Proceedings Article
In: 2017 International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, ASEM 2017, American Society for Engineering Management, 2017.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Commerce, Complexity, Delivery subsystem, Effectiveness and efficiencies, Efficiency, Life cycle, Market dynamics, Market strategies, Organization structures, Project delivery, Project management, Project management organization, Societies and institutions
@inproceedings{jazouli_rise_2017,
title = {The rise of complexity due to stakeholders structure along the lifecycle in project management organizations},
author = {A. Jazouli and T. M. Koplyay and B. Mitchell and H. Motaghi},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85040033522&partnerID=40&md5=b9472689a71e55954a94bd6a06e2df1d},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
booktitle = {2017 International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, ASEM 2017},
publisher = {American Society for Engineering Management},
abstract = {Much of complexity is hidden in structures of organizations, and the market forces significant adjustments to these structures during the dynamics of interactions as the market lifecycle unfolds. Market customer based profiles drive strategic choices, which in turn, exercise pressures on the alignment of organizations and their alliances or special delivery subsystems, such as projects. Early market strategies seek the right positioning and are effectiveness focused, and forgive mistakes and inefficiencies, whereas late market strategies search for alignment with the looming final cost leadership strategy by relentlessly concentrating on efficiency. Firms progress from many strategic choices to just one, and live the rest of their market lives under the inexorable dictates of efficiency, unless the market is rejuvenated by some disruptive intrusion. Both effectiveness and efficiency have their organization structure counterparts that best respond to these market signals. This paper will examine the rise of complexity due to stakeholders' structures in projects and the implications for the type of results delivered for host firms by the process. © 2017 American Society for Engineering Management.},
keywords = {Commerce, Complexity, Delivery subsystem, Effectiveness and efficiencies, Efficiency, Life cycle, Market dynamics, Market strategies, Organization structures, Project delivery, Project management, Project management organization, Societies and institutions},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
Much of complexity is hidden in structures of organizations, and the market forces significant adjustments to these structures during the dynamics of interactions as the market lifecycle unfolds. Market customer based profiles drive strategic choices, which in turn, exercise pressures on the alignment of organizations and their alliances or special delivery subsystems, such as projects. Early market strategies seek the right positioning and are effectiveness focused, and forgive mistakes and inefficiencies, whereas late market strategies search for alignment with the looming final cost leadership strategy by relentlessly concentrating on efficiency. Firms progress from many strategic choices to just one, and live the rest of their market lives under the inexorable dictates of efficiency, unless the market is rejuvenated by some disruptive intrusion. Both effectiveness and efficiency have their organization structure counterparts that best respond to these market signals. This paper will examine the rise of complexity due to stakeholders' structures in projects and the implications for the type of results delivered for host firms by the process. © 2017 American Society for Engineering Management.