Slide
Centre Interdisciplinaire
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
1.
Ørskov, P. T.; Lichtenstein, M. B.; Ernst, M. T.; Fasterholdt, I.; Matthiesen, A. F.; Scirea, M.; Bouchard, S.; Andersen, T. E.
In: Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 13, 2022, ISSN: 16640640 (ISSN), (Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, aged, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, anxiety assessment, Anxiety disorder, article, behavior disorder assessment, cognitive behavioral therapy, comparative effectiveness, controlled study, Depression, Drug Use Disorders Identification Test, electrodermal activity, exposure, Fear of Negative Evaluation, follow up, health economics, Heart Rate, human, Leibowitz Anxiety Scale, Machine learning, major clinical study, psychological distress assessment, psychophysiological measurements, randomized controlled trial, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, social anxiety, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, social phobia, Subjective Units of Distress Scale, therapy effect, treatment duration, treatment outcome, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy, Working Alliance Inventory
@article{orskov_cognitive_2022,
title = {Cognitive behavioral therapy with adaptive virtual reality exposure vs. cognitive behavioral therapy with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial},
author = {P. T. Ørskov and M. B. Lichtenstein and M. T. Ernst and I. Fasterholdt and A. F. Matthiesen and M. Scirea and S. Bouchard and T. E. Andersen},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85140322564&doi=10.3389%2ffpsyt.2022.991755&partnerID=40&md5=1dacd4e05081f4790ccd5e0d7224e0ca},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2022.991755},
issn = {16640640 (ISSN)},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
volume = {13},
abstract = {Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has a high prevalence and an early onset with recovery taking decades to occur. Current evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with virtual reality (VR) exposure. However, the evidence is based on a sparse number of studies with predominantly small sample sizes. There is a need for more trials investigating the optimal way of applying VR based exposure for SAD. In this trial, we will test the efficacy of CBT with adaptive VR exposure allowing adjustment of the exposure based on real-time monitoring of the participants's anxiety level. Methods: The trial is a randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, parallel-group superiority trail. The study has two arms: (1) CBT including exposure in vivo (CBT-Exp), (2) CBT including exposure therapy using individually tailored VR-content and a system to track anxiety levels (CBT-ExpVR). Treatment is individual, manual-based and consists of 10 weekly sessions with a duration of 60 min. The study includes 90 participants diagnosed with SAD. Assessments are carried out pre-treatment, mid-treatment and at follow-up (6 and 12 months). The primary outcome is the mean score on the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) with the primary endpoint being post-treatment. Discussion: The study adds to the existing knowledge by assessing the efficacy of CBT with adaptive VR exposure. The study has high methodological rigor using a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size that includes follow-up data and validated measures for social anxiety outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05302518. Copyright © 2022 Ørskov, Lichtenstein, Ernst, Fasterholdt, Matthiesen, Scirea, Bouchard and Andersen.},
note = {Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.},
keywords = {adult, aged, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, anxiety assessment, Anxiety disorder, article, behavior disorder assessment, cognitive behavioral therapy, comparative effectiveness, controlled study, Depression, Drug Use Disorders Identification Test, electrodermal activity, exposure, Fear of Negative Evaluation, follow up, health economics, Heart Rate, human, Leibowitz Anxiety Scale, Machine learning, major clinical study, psychological distress assessment, psychophysiological measurements, randomized controlled trial, Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, social anxiety, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, social phobia, Subjective Units of Distress Scale, therapy effect, treatment duration, treatment outcome, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy, Working Alliance Inventory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has a high prevalence and an early onset with recovery taking decades to occur. Current evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with virtual reality (VR) exposure. However, the evidence is based on a sparse number of studies with predominantly small sample sizes. There is a need for more trials investigating the optimal way of applying VR based exposure for SAD. In this trial, we will test the efficacy of CBT with adaptive VR exposure allowing adjustment of the exposure based on real-time monitoring of the participants's anxiety level. Methods: The trial is a randomized controlled, assessor-blinded, parallel-group superiority trail. The study has two arms: (1) CBT including exposure in vivo (CBT-Exp), (2) CBT including exposure therapy using individually tailored VR-content and a system to track anxiety levels (CBT-ExpVR). Treatment is individual, manual-based and consists of 10 weekly sessions with a duration of 60 min. The study includes 90 participants diagnosed with SAD. Assessments are carried out pre-treatment, mid-treatment and at follow-up (6 and 12 months). The primary outcome is the mean score on the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) with the primary endpoint being post-treatment. Discussion: The study adds to the existing knowledge by assessing the efficacy of CBT with adaptive VR exposure. The study has high methodological rigor using a randomized controlled trial with a large sample size that includes follow-up data and validated measures for social anxiety outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05302518. Copyright © 2022 Ørskov, Lichtenstein, Ernst, Fasterholdt, Matthiesen, Scirea, Bouchard and Andersen.
2.
Nolet, K.; Corno, G.; Bouchard, S.
In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 14, 2020, ISSN: 16625161, (Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Anxiety disorder, clinical decision making, cognitive behavioral therapy, comparative effectiveness, controlled study, evidence based medicine, human, intermethod comparison, mental health care personnel, mindfulness, randomized controlled trial (topic), review, therapy effect, validation study, virtual reality exposure therapy
@article{nolet_adoption_2020,
title = {The Adoption of New Treatment Modalities by Health Professionals and the Relative Weight of Empirical Evidence in Favor of Virtual Reality Exposure Versus Mindfulness in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders},
author = {K. Nolet and G. Corno and S. Bouchard},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083108852&doi=10.3389%2ffnhum.2020.00086&partnerID=40&md5=e72f1ece3a23c5283e1c9cc954c090bb},
doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2020.00086},
issn = {16625161},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
volume = {14},
abstract = {Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental disorders, and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure exercises is considered as the gold-standard psychological intervention. New psychotherapeutic modalities have emerged in the last decade and, among them, mindfulness has been rapidly adopted by therapists. The adoption rate is slower for the use of virtual reality (VR) to conduct exposure. The goal of the present position paper is to contrast, for the treatment of anxiety disorders, the weight of empirical evidences supporting the use of exposure in VR with the use of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT). Based on the most recent meta-analyses, we found that CBT with exposure conducted in VR was more thoroughly researched and supported than MBT, receiving validation from roughly twice as many studies with high control (i.e., randomized, active controls with clinical samples). However, this conclusion is nuanced by reviewing gaps in the literature for both therapies. Potential factors influencing clinicians’ choice of treatment and suggestions for future research directions are proposed. © Copyright © 2020 Nolet, Corno and Bouchard.},
note = {Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.},
keywords = {Anxiety disorder, clinical decision making, cognitive behavioral therapy, comparative effectiveness, controlled study, evidence based medicine, human, intermethod comparison, mental health care personnel, mindfulness, randomized controlled trial (topic), review, therapy effect, validation study, virtual reality exposure therapy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anxiety disorders are among the most prevalent mental disorders, and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with exposure exercises is considered as the gold-standard psychological intervention. New psychotherapeutic modalities have emerged in the last decade and, among them, mindfulness has been rapidly adopted by therapists. The adoption rate is slower for the use of virtual reality (VR) to conduct exposure. The goal of the present position paper is to contrast, for the treatment of anxiety disorders, the weight of empirical evidences supporting the use of exposure in VR with the use of mindfulness-based therapy (MBT). Based on the most recent meta-analyses, we found that CBT with exposure conducted in VR was more thoroughly researched and supported than MBT, receiving validation from roughly twice as many studies with high control (i.e., randomized, active controls with clinical samples). However, this conclusion is nuanced by reviewing gaps in the literature for both therapies. Potential factors influencing clinicians’ choice of treatment and suggestions for future research directions are proposed. © Copyright © 2020 Nolet, Corno and Bouchard.
3.
Bouchard, S.; Dumoulin, S.; Robillard, G.; Guitard, T.; Klinger, E.; Forget, H.; Loranger, C.; Roucaut, F. X.
Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomised controlled trial Journal Article
In: British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 210, no. 4, pp. 276–283, 2017, ISSN: 00071250, (Publisher: Royal College of Psychiatrists).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, article, avoidance behavior, clinical outcome, cognitive therapy, comparative effectiveness, comparative study, computer interface, controlled study, cost, devices, female, hospital admission, human, Humans, Implosive Therapy, in vivo study, major clinical study, male, Middle Aged, outcome assessment, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), phobia, procedures, randomized controlled trial, Social, social phobia, User-Computer Interface, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy
@article{bouchard_virtual_2017,
title = {Virtual reality compared with in vivo exposure in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: A three-arm randomised controlled trial},
author = {S. Bouchard and S. Dumoulin and G. Robillard and T. Guitard and E. Klinger and H. Forget and C. Loranger and F. X. Roucaut},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85018214603&doi=10.1192%2fbjp.bp.116.184234&partnerID=40&md5=245751bf4ef3f8ae014a9c5816a585c3},
doi = {10.1192/bjp.bp.116.184234},
issn = {00071250},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {British Journal of Psychiatry},
volume = {210},
number = {4},
pages = {276–283},
abstract = {Background: People with social anxiety disorder (SAD) fear social interactions and may be reluctant to seek treatments involving exposure to social situations. Social exposure conducted in virtual reality (VR), embedded in individual cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), could be an answer. Aims: To show that conducting VR exposure in CBT for SAD is effective and is more practical for therapists than conducting exposure in vivo. Method: Participants were randomly assigned to either VR exposure (n =17), in vivo exposure (n=22) or waiting list (n= 20). Participants in the active arms received individual CBT for 14 weekly sessions and outcome was assessed with questionnaires and a behaviour avoidance test. (Trial registration number ISRCTN99747069.) Results: Improvements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list. Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment than in vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure. Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. VR was significantly more practical for therapists than in vivo exposure. Conclusions: Using VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure. Declaration of interest S.B. and G.R. are consultants to and own equity in Cliniques et Développement In Virtuo, which develops virtual environments; however, Cliniques et Développement In Virtuo did not create the virtual environments used in this study. The terms of these arrangements were reviewed and approved by Universitédu Québec en Outaouais, in accordance with its policy on conflicts of interest. © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017.},
note = {Publisher: Royal College of Psychiatrists},
keywords = {adult, article, avoidance behavior, clinical outcome, cognitive therapy, comparative effectiveness, comparative study, computer interface, controlled study, cost, devices, female, hospital admission, human, Humans, Implosive Therapy, in vivo study, major clinical study, male, Middle Aged, outcome assessment, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), phobia, procedures, randomized controlled trial, Social, social phobia, User-Computer Interface, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: People with social anxiety disorder (SAD) fear social interactions and may be reluctant to seek treatments involving exposure to social situations. Social exposure conducted in virtual reality (VR), embedded in individual cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), could be an answer. Aims: To show that conducting VR exposure in CBT for SAD is effective and is more practical for therapists than conducting exposure in vivo. Method: Participants were randomly assigned to either VR exposure (n =17), in vivo exposure (n=22) or waiting list (n= 20). Participants in the active arms received individual CBT for 14 weekly sessions and outcome was assessed with questionnaires and a behaviour avoidance test. (Trial registration number ISRCTN99747069.) Results: Improvements were found on the primary (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and all five secondary outcome measures in both CBT groups compared with the waiting list. Conducting exposure in VR was more effective at post-treatment than in vivo on the primary outcome measure and on one secondary measure. Improvements were maintained at the 6-month follow-up. VR was significantly more practical for therapists than in vivo exposure. Conclusions: Using VR can be advantageous over standard CBT as a potential solution for treatment avoidance and as an efficient, cost-effective and practical medium of exposure. Declaration of interest S.B. and G.R. are consultants to and own equity in Cliniques et Développement In Virtuo, which develops virtual environments; however, Cliniques et Développement In Virtuo did not create the virtual environments used in this study. The terms of these arrangements were reviewed and approved by Universitédu Québec en Outaouais, in accordance with its policy on conflicts of interest. © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017.