Slide
Centre Interdisciplinaire
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
1.
Linnaranta, O.; Cardona, L. G.; Seon, Q.; Tukkiapik, A.; Outerbridge, J.; Bouchard, S.
In: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 513–525, 2025, ISSN: 10777229 (ISSN).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adaptation, adult, article, behavior therapy, clinical article, cognitive behavioral therapy, cultural adaptation, cultural safety, emotion regulation, Environment, environmental exposure, female, health care quality, health service, human, information processing, Inuit, male, manipulative medicine, Mental health, mental health care access, participatory co-design, Problem solving, psychotherapist, psychotherapy, Quebec, software, virtual reality
@article{linnarantaViewsCulturallySafe2025,
title = {Views on a Culturally Safe Psychotherapeutic Treatment by Inuit in Quebec: Co-Design of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Manual and Virtual Exposure Environments},
author = {O. Linnaranta and L. G. Cardona and Q. Seon and A. Tukkiapik and J. Outerbridge and S. Bouchard},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199212719?origin=resultslist},
doi = {10.1016/j.cbpra.2024.04.006},
issn = {10777229 (ISSN)},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-01-01},
journal = {Cognitive and Behavioral Practice},
volume = {32},
number = {4},
pages = {513–525},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
abstract = {Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) can be combined with virtual reality (VR) to provide culturally safe and remotely delivered emotion regulation interventions. We conducted a co-design process of a CBT treatment manual and complementary VR environments for the Inuit populations from Nunavik. Here, we describe the knowledge gained during the adaptation process on the approach to mental well-being and psychotherapy. We followed qualitative, participatory, and research co-design methods. After an initial concept of VR-CBT, an advisory group made up of 7 adults identifying as or working with Inuit participated in 4 focus group meetings. A thematic analysis of the discussions was carried out. A non-symptom-focused approach with the therapist guiding the individual in empowerment and emotion management was accepted in the advisory group, replacing a symptom-focus. Several CBT in- and between-session techniques were seen critically or rejected, and time for working on a certain theme was increased. Some elements in the proposed landscape were rejected as unsafe, other elements added as culture-specific to increase safety. Future work should confirm broader acceptance and utility. Culturally specific factors play an essential role in acceptance of concepts and approaches used in psychotherapy. Accordingly, they can have an impact on acceptance and attendance in therapy. © 2024 Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/},
keywords = {Adaptation, adult, article, behavior therapy, clinical article, cognitive behavioral therapy, cultural adaptation, cultural safety, emotion regulation, Environment, environmental exposure, female, health care quality, health service, human, information processing, Inuit, male, manipulative medicine, Mental health, mental health care access, participatory co-design, Problem solving, psychotherapist, psychotherapy, Quebec, software, virtual reality},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) can be combined with virtual reality (VR) to provide culturally safe and remotely delivered emotion regulation interventions. We conducted a co-design process of a CBT treatment manual and complementary VR environments for the Inuit populations from Nunavik. Here, we describe the knowledge gained during the adaptation process on the approach to mental well-being and psychotherapy. We followed qualitative, participatory, and research co-design methods. After an initial concept of VR-CBT, an advisory group made up of 7 adults identifying as or working with Inuit participated in 4 focus group meetings. A thematic analysis of the discussions was carried out. A non-symptom-focused approach with the therapist guiding the individual in empowerment and emotion management was accepted in the advisory group, replacing a symptom-focus. Several CBT in- and between-session techniques were seen critically or rejected, and time for working on a certain theme was increased. Some elements in the proposed landscape were rejected as unsafe, other elements added as culture-specific to increase safety. Future work should confirm broader acceptance and utility. Culturally specific factors play an essential role in acceptance of concepts and approaches used in psychotherapy. Accordingly, they can have an impact on acceptance and attendance in therapy. © 2024 Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
2.
Woodley, T.; Gagnon, S.
BPM and SOA: Synergies and challenges Journal Article
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3806 LNCS, pp. 679–688, 2005, ISSN: 03029743, (ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175 Place: New York, NY).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: BPM solution, Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), Computational complexity, Computer architecture, Formal languages, Information management, Information technology, Problem solving, SOA service management, Symbiotic relationships, World Wide Web
@article{woodley_bpm_2005,
title = {BPM and SOA: Synergies and challenges},
author = {T. Woodley and S. Gagnon},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33744797648&doi=10.1007%2f11581062_75&partnerID=40&md5=d2c8bdaf2afbc46137231ecb42bc8151},
doi = {10.1007/11581062_75},
issn = {03029743},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
volume = {3806 LNCS},
pages = {679–688},
abstract = {While BPM and SOA have evolved independently, there is an inevitable symbiotic relationship between them. As well, a SOA can be developed using various service formats, whether unique Web Services, orchestrated services using the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), or other service providers. A SOA promotes the creation of highly accessible, loosely coupled, discrete business services. For greatest reach, BPM consumes and leverages such services, tying them together to solve and streamline broad business challenges. Not surprisingly however, there are certain considerations while designing a SOA to support BPM. Certain service designs align well within a BPM solution or strategy, while others can cause significant headaches for an overall BPM solution. Conversely, SOA with BPM layered on top can become an entirely different value proposition as compared to SOA alone. As a backbone for SOA components, BPM can integrate important functionalities to extend the value of the SOA investment. Similarly, BPM can provide a platform for SOA service management. We will explore the interdependencies between BPM and SOA, and will provide practical guidance on how to make each implementation mutually supportive, extending the reach and value of each. We will also discuess whether SOA alone can provide the business service functionality required for BPM solutions of the future, or if other complementary architectures may also have a role to play. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.},
note = {ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175
Place: New York, NY},
keywords = {BPM solution, Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), Computational complexity, Computer architecture, Formal languages, Information management, Information technology, Problem solving, SOA service management, Symbiotic relationships, World Wide Web},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
While BPM and SOA have evolved independently, there is an inevitable symbiotic relationship between them. As well, a SOA can be developed using various service formats, whether unique Web Services, orchestrated services using the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), or other service providers. A SOA promotes the creation of highly accessible, loosely coupled, discrete business services. For greatest reach, BPM consumes and leverages such services, tying them together to solve and streamline broad business challenges. Not surprisingly however, there are certain considerations while designing a SOA to support BPM. Certain service designs align well within a BPM solution or strategy, while others can cause significant headaches for an overall BPM solution. Conversely, SOA with BPM layered on top can become an entirely different value proposition as compared to SOA alone. As a backbone for SOA components, BPM can integrate important functionalities to extend the value of the SOA investment. Similarly, BPM can provide a platform for SOA service management. We will explore the interdependencies between BPM and SOA, and will provide practical guidance on how to make each implementation mutually supportive, extending the reach and value of each. We will also discuess whether SOA alone can provide the business service functionality required for BPM solutions of the future, or if other complementary architectures may also have a role to play. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
3.
Gagnon, S.
Are we ready for the service oriented architecture? Journal Article
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3806 LNCS, pp. 765, 2005, ISSN: 03029743, (ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175 Place: New York, NY).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Administrative data processing, Adopter perspectives, Business Rules Systems, Computer architecture, Computer science, Configuration Management, Information analysis, Information technology, Open Source Solutions, Problem solving, Service oriented architecture, World Wide Web
@article{gagnon_are_2005,
title = {Are we ready for the service oriented architecture?},
author = {S. Gagnon},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33744824076&doi=10.1007%2f11581062_86&partnerID=40&md5=0a3efa749b3c4efa8cf2039b0ea43815},
doi = {10.1007/11581062_86},
issn = {03029743},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
volume = {3806 LNCS},
pages = {765},
abstract = {This Industry Track Panel poses a strategic question, "Are We Ready for the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)?" We discuss this issue from both vendor and adopter perspectives in the company of 5 IT Executives. In particular, we go beyond the discussion of SOA standards as such, and try to assess the importance of this approach from the point of view of related technologies, such as Business Process Management, Enterprise Architecture, Configuration Management, Business Rules Systems, and Open Source Solutions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.},
note = {ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175
Place: New York, NY},
keywords = {Administrative data processing, Adopter perspectives, Business Rules Systems, Computer architecture, Computer science, Configuration Management, Information analysis, Information technology, Open Source Solutions, Problem solving, Service oriented architecture, World Wide Web},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This Industry Track Panel poses a strategic question, "Are We Ready for the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)?" We discuss this issue from both vendor and adopter perspectives in the company of 5 IT Executives. In particular, we go beyond the discussion of SOA standards as such, and try to assess the importance of this approach from the point of view of related technologies, such as Business Process Management, Enterprise Architecture, Configuration Management, Business Rules Systems, and Open Source Solutions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
4.
Gagnon, S.
Are we ready for the service oriented architecture? Journal Article
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3806 LNCS, pp. 765, 2005, ISSN: 03029743, (ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175 Place: New York, NY).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Administrative data processing, Adopter perspectives, Business Rules Systems, Computer architecture, Computer science, Configuration Management, Information analysis, Information technology, Open Source Solutions, Problem solving, Service oriented architecture, World Wide Web
@article{gagnonAreWeReady2005,
title = {Are we ready for the service oriented architecture?},
author = {S. Gagnon},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33744824076&doi=10.1007%2f11581062_86&partnerID=40&md5=0a3efa749b3c4efa8cf2039b0ea43815},
doi = {10.1007/11581062_86},
issn = {03029743},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
volume = {3806 LNCS},
pages = {765},
abstract = {This Industry Track Panel poses a strategic question, "Are We Ready for the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)?" We discuss this issue from both vendor and adopter perspectives in the company of 5 IT Executives. In particular, we go beyond the discussion of SOA standards as such, and try to assess the importance of this approach from the point of view of related technologies, such as Business Process Management, Enterprise Architecture, Configuration Management, Business Rules Systems, and Open Source Solutions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.},
note = {ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175
Place: New York, NY},
keywords = {Administrative data processing, Adopter perspectives, Business Rules Systems, Computer architecture, Computer science, Configuration Management, Information analysis, Information technology, Open Source Solutions, Problem solving, Service oriented architecture, World Wide Web},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This Industry Track Panel poses a strategic question, "Are We Ready for the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)?" We discuss this issue from both vendor and adopter perspectives in the company of 5 IT Executives. In particular, we go beyond the discussion of SOA standards as such, and try to assess the importance of this approach from the point of view of related technologies, such as Business Process Management, Enterprise Architecture, Configuration Management, Business Rules Systems, and Open Source Solutions. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
5.
Woodley, T.; Gagnon, S.
BPM and SOA: Synergies and challenges Journal Article
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3806 LNCS, pp. 679–688, 2005, ISSN: 03029743, (ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175 Place: New York, NY).
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: BPM solution, Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), Computational complexity, Computer architecture, Formal languages, Information management, Information technology, Problem solving, SOA service management, Symbiotic relationships, World Wide Web
@article{woodleyBPMSOASynergies2005,
title = {BPM and SOA: Synergies and challenges},
author = {T. Woodley and S. Gagnon},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33744797648&doi=10.1007%2f11581062_75&partnerID=40&md5=d2c8bdaf2afbc46137231ecb42bc8151},
doi = {10.1007/11581062_75},
issn = {03029743},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)},
volume = {3806 LNCS},
pages = {679–688},
abstract = {While BPM and SOA have evolved independently, there is an inevitable symbiotic relationship between them. As well, a SOA can be developed using various service formats, whether unique Web Services, orchestrated services using the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), or other service providers. A SOA promotes the creation of highly accessible, loosely coupled, discrete business services. For greatest reach, BPM consumes and leverages such services, tying them together to solve and streamline broad business challenges. Not surprisingly however, there are certain considerations while designing a SOA to support BPM. Certain service designs align well within a BPM solution or strategy, while others can cause significant headaches for an overall BPM solution. Conversely, SOA with BPM layered on top can become an entirely different value proposition as compared to SOA alone. As a backbone for SOA components, BPM can integrate important functionalities to extend the value of the SOA investment. Similarly, BPM can provide a platform for SOA service management. We will explore the interdependencies between BPM and SOA, and will provide practical guidance on how to make each implementation mutually supportive, extending the reach and value of each. We will also discuess whether SOA alone can provide the business service functionality required for BPM solutions of the future, or if other complementary architectures may also have a role to play. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.},
note = {ISBN: 3540300171; 9783540300175
Place: New York, NY},
keywords = {BPM solution, Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), Computational complexity, Computer architecture, Formal languages, Information management, Information technology, Problem solving, SOA service management, Symbiotic relationships, World Wide Web},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
While BPM and SOA have evolved independently, there is an inevitable symbiotic relationship between them. As well, a SOA can be developed using various service formats, whether unique Web Services, orchestrated services using the Business Process Execution Language (BPEL), or other service providers. A SOA promotes the creation of highly accessible, loosely coupled, discrete business services. For greatest reach, BPM consumes and leverages such services, tying them together to solve and streamline broad business challenges. Not surprisingly however, there are certain considerations while designing a SOA to support BPM. Certain service designs align well within a BPM solution or strategy, while others can cause significant headaches for an overall BPM solution. Conversely, SOA with BPM layered on top can become an entirely different value proposition as compared to SOA alone. As a backbone for SOA components, BPM can integrate important functionalities to extend the value of the SOA investment. Similarly, BPM can provide a platform for SOA service management. We will explore the interdependencies between BPM and SOA, and will provide practical guidance on how to make each implementation mutually supportive, extending the reach and value of each. We will also discuess whether SOA alone can provide the business service functionality required for BPM solutions of the future, or if other complementary architectures may also have a role to play. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.