

de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
Dumoulin, S.; Bouchard, S.; Loranger, C.; Quintana, P.; Gougeon, V.; Lavoie, K. L.
Are cognitive load and focus of attention differentially involved in pain management: An experimental study using a cold pressor test and virtual reality Article de journal
Dans: Journal of Pain Research, vol. 13, p. 2213–2222, 2020, ISSN: 11787090 (ISSN), (Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: adult, analgesia, analgesic activity, article, attention, clinical article, Cognitive load, cold pressor test, controlled study, CPT, Distraction, experimental study, female, human, immersion, male, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain, pain intensity, pain threshold, randomized controlled trial, rating scale, replication study, virtual reality
@article{dumoulin_are_2020,
title = {Are cognitive load and focus of attention differentially involved in pain management: An experimental study using a cold pressor test and virtual reality},
author = {S. Dumoulin and S. Bouchard and C. Loranger and P. Quintana and V. Gougeon and K. L. Lavoie},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090185237&doi=10.2147%2fJPR.S238766&partnerID=40&md5=38278e890412e4529b0a740f4a6a881e},
doi = {10.2147/JPR.S238766},
issn = {11787090 (ISSN)},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Pain Research},
volume = {13},
pages = {2213–2222},
abstract = {Objective: The aim of this study is to assess whether distraction (lack of attentional focus) and attention (cognitive load) are differentially involved in the analgesic effect of virtual reality (VR) immersions during a cold pressor test (CPT). Methods: Thirty-one participants were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions (high and low cognitive load, attention with or without a reminder of the pain stimuli) and performed three CPTs. Pain was assessed based on the duration of the CPT (pain tolerance), a visual analog rating scale of perceived pain intensity during the CPT and the subjective pain scale of the Short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Results: The statistical analyses revealed that VR immersions were associated with less pain compared to the baseline (all p <0.001), but for the experimental manipulations, only the conditions where there was an increase in cognitive load (ie, from low cognitive load at Immersion 1 to high cognitive load at Immersion 2) were effective for increasing pain tolerance (significant Time X Conditions interaction). The interactions were not significant for pain intensity assessed with the VAS or the SF-MPQ. Conclusion: The results suggest that increases in cognitive load play an important role in the analgesic effect of VR immersion, although the combination of attentional focus and cognitive load may be important. Suggestions are given for designing a replication study. © 2020 Dumoulin et al.},
note = {Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd},
keywords = {adult, analgesia, analgesic activity, article, attention, clinical article, Cognitive load, cold pressor test, controlled study, CPT, Distraction, experimental study, female, human, immersion, male, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain, pain intensity, pain threshold, randomized controlled trial, rating scale, replication study, virtual reality},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}