@article{maiano_validation_2023,

title = {Validation of an Adapted Version of the Glasgow Anxiety Scale for People with Intellectual Disabilities (GAS-ID)},

author = {C. Maïano and A. J. S. Morin and C. Gagnon and E. Olivier and D. Tracey and R. G. Craven and S. Bouchard},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125069450&doi=10.1007%2fs10803-021-05398-7&partnerID=40&md5=7347eb15e719941ce5eca046eb7f4564},

doi = {10.1007/s10803-021-05398-7},

issn = {01623257},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders},

volume = {53},

number = {4},

pages = {1560–1572},

abstract = {The objective of the study was to validate adapted versions of the Glasgow Anxiety Scale for people with Intellectual Disabilities (GAS-ID) simultaneously developed in English and French. A sample of 361 youth with mild to moderate intellectual disability (ID) (M = 15.78 years) from Australia (English-speaking) and Canada (French-speaking) participated in this study. The results supported the factor validity and reliability, measurement invariance (between English and French versions), a lack of differential items functioning (as a function of youth’s age and ID level, but not sex in the English-Australian sample), temporal stability (over one year interval), and convergent validity (with global self-esteem and school loneliness) of a bi-factor exploratory structural equation modeling representation of the GAS-ID. The present study supports the psychometric properties of the English-Australian and French-Canadian versions of the adapted GAS-ID. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.},

note = {Publisher: Springer},

keywords = {Adolescent, adult, Anxiety, anxiety assessment, article, Australia, autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Canada, Child, confirmatory factor analysis, controlled study, convergent validity, emotion assessment, English (language), exploratory structural equation modeling, female, French (language), glasgow anxiety scale, human, Humans, instrument validation, Intellectual Disability, intellectual impairment, intelligence quotient, loneliness, major clinical study, male, Psychometrics, psychometry, reliability, reproducibility, Reproducibility of Results, school child, school loneliness scale, self description questionnaire 1, self esteem, self report, self-concept assessment, statistical analysis, validity, Young Adult},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{maiano_prevalence_2018,

title = {Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders among youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis},

author = {C. Maïano and S. Coutu and D. Tracey and S. Bouchard and G. Lepage and A. J. S. Morin and G. Moullec},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046664327&doi=10.1016%2fj.jad.2018.04.029&partnerID=40&md5=504c552402432a5b6443d07f63170403},

doi = {10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.029},

issn = {01650327},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Affective Disorders},

volume = {236},

pages = {230–242},

abstract = {Background: The purpose of this meta-analytic study was to determine the pooled prevalence estimates of anxiety and depressive disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID) and to assess the extent to which these pooled prevalence rates differed according to studies’ characteristics. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in nine databases and 21 studies, published between 1975 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety and depressive disorders were respectively (a) 5.4% and 2.8% across samples; (b) 1.2% and 0.03% among children; and (c) 7.9% and 1.4% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates for specific subtypes of anxiety disorders ranged from (a) 0.2% to 11.5% across samples; (b) 0.7% to 17.6% among children; and (c) 0.6% to 19.8% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates of dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder were respectively (a) 3.4% and 2.5% across samples; (b) 2.1% and 3.2% among children; and (c) 6.9% and 5.7% among adolescents. Finally, subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder; and combined subtypes of depressive disorders. Limitations: The present findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution given several limitations related to the characteristics of the populations, diagnostic method and sampling method. Conclusion: Findings provide recommendations for future studies investigating psychological disorders among youth with ID, as well as how clinicians and policy makers can improve diagnostic practices and support for youth with ID. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.},

note = {Publisher: Elsevier B.V.},

keywords = {Adolescent, adolescent disease, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Child, childhood disease, Depression, Depressive Disorder, dysthymia, Dysthymic Disorder, female, generalized anxiety disorder, human, Humans, infant, Intellectual Disability, intellectual impairment, Major, major depression, male, meta analysis, Newborn, obsessive compulsive disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Preschool, preschool child, Prevalence, priority journal, psychology, review, systematic review, Young Adult},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}