Slide
Centre Interdisciplinaire
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
de Recherche et d’Innovation
en Cybersécurité et Société
1.
Scholten, W.; Seldenrijk, A.; Hoogendoorn, A.; Bosman, R.; Muntingh, A.; Karyotaki, E.; Andersson, G.; Berger, T.; Carlbring, P.; Furmark, T.; Bouchard, S.; Goldin, P.; Kampmann, I.; Morina, N.; Kocovski, N.; Leibing, E.; Leichsenring, F.; Stolz, T.; Balkom, A. Van; Batelaan, N.
Dans: JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 80, no 8, p. 822–831, 2023, ISSN: 2168622X (ISSN), (Publisher: American Medical Association).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: adult, antidepressant agent, Anxiety disorder, article, avoidant personality disorder, clinical outcome, cognitive behavioral therapy, comorbidity, cycloserine, Depression, disease severity, female, hospital admission, human, Humans, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, male, meta analysis, paroxetine, phobia, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, procedures, psychotropic agent, randomized controlled trial (topic), Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, semi structured interview, Social, social anxiety, social phobia, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders, symptom, systematic review, treatment response, Waiting Lists
@article{scholten_baseline_2023,
title = {Baseline Severity as a Moderator of the Waiting List-Controlled Association of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Symptom Change in Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis},
author = {W. Scholten and A. Seldenrijk and A. Hoogendoorn and R. Bosman and A. Muntingh and E. Karyotaki and G. Andersson and T. Berger and P. Carlbring and T. Furmark and S. Bouchard and P. Goldin and I. Kampmann and N. Morina and N. Kocovski and E. Leibing and F. Leichsenring and T. Stolz and A. Van Balkom and N. Batelaan},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166386036&doi=10.1001%2fjamapsychiatry.2023.1291&partnerID=40&md5=c279c8b0ff2d3b4558c6f8803cdda0af},
doi = {10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.1291},
issn = {2168622X (ISSN)},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-01},
journal = {JAMA Psychiatry},
volume = {80},
number = {8},
pages = {822–831},
abstract = {Importance: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be adequately treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). However, there is a large gap in knowledge on factors associated with prognosis, and it is unclear whether symptom severity predicts response to CBT for SAD. Objective: To examine baseline SAD symptom severity as a moderator of the association between CBT and symptom change in patients with SAD. Data Sources: For this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA), PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1990, to January 13, 2023. Primary search topics were social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavior therapy, and randomized controlled trial. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials comparing CBT with being on a waiting list and using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) in adults with a primary clinical diagnosis of SAD. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Authors of included studies were approached to provide individual-level data. Data were extracted by pairs of authors following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. An IPDMA was conducted using a 2-stage approach for the association of CBT with change in LSAS scores from baseline to posttreatment and for the interaction effect of baseline LSAS score by condition using random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the baseline to posttreatment change in symptom severity measured by the LSAS. Results: A total of 12 studies including 1246 patients with SAD (mean [SD] age, 35.3 [10.9] years; 738 [59.2%] female) were included in the meta-analysis. A waiting list-controlled association between CBT and pretreatment to posttreatment LSAS change was found (b = -20.3; 95% CI, -24.9 to -15.6; P <.001; Cohen d = -0.95; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.73). Baseline LSAS scores moderated the differences between CBT and waiting list with respect to pretreatment to posttreatment symptom reductions (b = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.06; P =.009), indicating that individuals with severe symptoms had larger waiting list-controlled symptom reductions after CBT (Cohen d = -1.13 [95% CI, -1.39 to -0.88] for patients with very severe SAD; Cohen d = -0.54 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.29] for patients with mild SAD). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and IPDMA, higher baseline SAD symptom severity was associated with greater (absolute but not relative) symptom reductions after CBT in patients with SAD. The findings contribute to personalized care by suggesting that clinicians can confidently offer CBT to individuals with severe SAD symptoms.. © 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.},
note = {Publisher: American Medical Association},
keywords = {adult, antidepressant agent, Anxiety disorder, article, avoidant personality disorder, clinical outcome, cognitive behavioral therapy, comorbidity, cycloserine, Depression, disease severity, female, hospital admission, human, Humans, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, male, meta analysis, paroxetine, phobia, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, procedures, psychotropic agent, randomized controlled trial (topic), Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, semi structured interview, Social, social anxiety, social phobia, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders, symptom, systematic review, treatment response, Waiting Lists},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Importance: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be adequately treated with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). However, there is a large gap in knowledge on factors associated with prognosis, and it is unclear whether symptom severity predicts response to CBT for SAD. Objective: To examine baseline SAD symptom severity as a moderator of the association between CBT and symptom change in patients with SAD. Data Sources: For this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA), PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1990, to January 13, 2023. Primary search topics were social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavior therapy, and randomized controlled trial. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials comparing CBT with being on a waiting list and using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) in adults with a primary clinical diagnosis of SAD. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Authors of included studies were approached to provide individual-level data. Data were extracted by pairs of authors following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. An IPDMA was conducted using a 2-stage approach for the association of CBT with change in LSAS scores from baseline to posttreatment and for the interaction effect of baseline LSAS score by condition using random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the baseline to posttreatment change in symptom severity measured by the LSAS. Results: A total of 12 studies including 1246 patients with SAD (mean [SD] age, 35.3 [10.9] years; 738 [59.2%] female) were included in the meta-analysis. A waiting list-controlled association between CBT and pretreatment to posttreatment LSAS change was found (b = -20.3; 95% CI, -24.9 to -15.6; P <.001; Cohen d = -0.95; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.73). Baseline LSAS scores moderated the differences between CBT and waiting list with respect to pretreatment to posttreatment symptom reductions (b = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.06; P =.009), indicating that individuals with severe symptoms had larger waiting list-controlled symptom reductions after CBT (Cohen d = -1.13 [95% CI, -1.39 to -0.88] for patients with very severe SAD; Cohen d = -0.54 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.29] for patients with mild SAD). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and IPDMA, higher baseline SAD symptom severity was associated with greater (absolute but not relative) symptom reductions after CBT in patients with SAD. The findings contribute to personalized care by suggesting that clinicians can confidently offer CBT to individuals with severe SAD symptoms.. © 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
2.
Maltais, C.; Cyr, C.; Parent, G.; Pascuzzo, K.
Identifying effective interventions for promoting parent engagement and family reunification for children in out-of-home care: A series of meta-analyses Article de journal
Dans: Child Abuse and Neglect, vol. 88, p. 362–375, 2019, ISSN: 01452134, (Publisher: Elsevier Ltd).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: article, Child, child care, child parent relation, child protection, controlled study, Education, effect size, female, foster care, Foster Home Care, Health Promotion, home care, human, Humans, male, meta analysis, motivation, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Preschool, preschool child, psychology, residential care, staff training
@article{maltais_identifying_2019,
title = {Identifying effective interventions for promoting parent engagement and family reunification for children in out-of-home care: A series of meta-analyses},
author = {C. Maltais and C. Cyr and G. Parent and K. Pascuzzo},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058662463&doi=10.1016%2fj.chiabu.2018.12.009&partnerID=40&md5=29d6296703385fbe23f51707ee6de947},
doi = {10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.009},
issn = {01452134},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
journal = {Child Abuse and Neglect},
volume = {88},
pages = {362–375},
abstract = {Background: An important obstacle for family reunification following child placement in residential care and other temporary out-of-home care services is the lack of engagement among parents. Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the most effective interventions to promote parental engagement and family reunification. Method and participants: Eight studies, for a total of 2996 families, were used to conduct two series of meta-analyses. Each study examined the effectiveness of a goal-oriented parental engagement intervention, relative to a control group made up of parents who received standard services. Six moderators were analyzed: type of clinical modality, number of clinical strategies, sources of motivation for intervention, focus on the child care staff-parent relationship, child care staff training, and strategies to promote access to intervention. Results: Results indicate that parents exposed to goal-oriented engagement interventions showed greater engagement (effect size d = 0.71, CI: 0.35–1.07, p < 0.001) and likelihood of reunification (effect size OR = 2.49, CI: 1.22–5.10, p < 0.05) than parents who received standard services. In particular, moderator analysis showed that parents who specifically participated in a family-focused intervention showed the highest engagement in comparison to parents involved in other types of interventions or who received standard services (effect size d = 1.08, CI: 0.58–1.59, p < 0.001). No moderators significantly explained heterogeneity of studies on family reunification. Conclusion: Overall, the results underline the effectiveness of family-focused interventions to promote parental engagement. Nevertheless, greater knowledge on the mechanisms by which interventions can increase parents’ engagement and family reunification is still needed. © 2018},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Ltd},
keywords = {article, Child, child care, child parent relation, child protection, controlled study, Education, effect size, female, foster care, Foster Home Care, Health Promotion, home care, human, Humans, male, meta analysis, motivation, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Preschool, preschool child, psychology, residential care, staff training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: An important obstacle for family reunification following child placement in residential care and other temporary out-of-home care services is the lack of engagement among parents. Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the most effective interventions to promote parental engagement and family reunification. Method and participants: Eight studies, for a total of 2996 families, were used to conduct two series of meta-analyses. Each study examined the effectiveness of a goal-oriented parental engagement intervention, relative to a control group made up of parents who received standard services. Six moderators were analyzed: type of clinical modality, number of clinical strategies, sources of motivation for intervention, focus on the child care staff-parent relationship, child care staff training, and strategies to promote access to intervention. Results: Results indicate that parents exposed to goal-oriented engagement interventions showed greater engagement (effect size d = 0.71, CI: 0.35–1.07, p < 0.001) and likelihood of reunification (effect size OR = 2.49, CI: 1.22–5.10, p < 0.05) than parents who received standard services. In particular, moderator analysis showed that parents who specifically participated in a family-focused intervention showed the highest engagement in comparison to parents involved in other types of interventions or who received standard services (effect size d = 1.08, CI: 0.58–1.59, p < 0.001). No moderators significantly explained heterogeneity of studies on family reunification. Conclusion: Overall, the results underline the effectiveness of family-focused interventions to promote parental engagement. Nevertheless, greater knowledge on the mechanisms by which interventions can increase parents’ engagement and family reunification is still needed. © 2018
3.
Fernández-Álvarez, J.; Rozental, A.; Carlbring, P.; Colombo, D.; Riva, G.; Anderson, P. L.; Baños, R. M.; Benbow, A. A.; Bouchard, S.; Bretón-López, J. M.; Cárdenas, G.; Difede, J.; Emmelkamp, P.; García-Palacios, A.; Guillén, V.; Hoffman, H.; Kampann, I.; Moldovan, R.; Mühlberger, A.; North, M.; Pauli, P.; Castro, W. Peñate; Quero, S.; Tortella-Feliu, M.; Wyka, K.; Botella, C.
Deterioration rates in Virtual Reality Therapy: An individual patient data level meta-analysis Article de journal
Dans: Journal of Anxiety Disorders, vol. 61, p. 3–17, 2019, ISSN: 08876185 (ISSN), (Publisher: Elsevier Ltd).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: Adolescent, adult, aged, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, article, demography, deterioration, Deterioration rates, disease association, female, human, Humans, Individual patient data analysis, male, marriage, meta analysis, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, outcome assessment, Probability, psychology, randomized controlled trial (topic), social status, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy, Young Adult
@article{fernandez-alvarez_deterioration_2019,
title = {Deterioration rates in Virtual Reality Therapy: An individual patient data level meta-analysis},
author = {J. Fernández-Álvarez and A. Rozental and P. Carlbring and D. Colombo and G. Riva and P. L. Anderson and R. M. Baños and A. A. Benbow and S. Bouchard and J. M. Bretón-López and G. Cárdenas and J. Difede and P. Emmelkamp and A. García-Palacios and V. Guillén and H. Hoffman and I. Kampann and R. Moldovan and A. Mühlberger and M. North and P. Pauli and W. Peñate Castro and S. Quero and M. Tortella-Feliu and K. Wyka and C. Botella},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050381788&doi=10.1016%2fj.janxdis.2018.06.005&partnerID=40&md5=012fdcaa9b8676314cbf22c52c91135b},
doi = {10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.005},
issn = {08876185 (ISSN)},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Anxiety Disorders},
volume = {61},
pages = {3–17},
abstract = {Ample evidence supports the use of Virtual Reality (VR) for anxiety disorders. Nonetheless, currently there is no evidence about moderators or potential negative effects of VR treatment strategies. An Individual Patient Data (IPD) approach was employed with 15 retrieved datasets. The current study sample was composed of 810 patients. Randomized control trials (RCTs) for each primary outcome measure were performed, in addition to moderator analyses of the socio-demographic variables. Deterioration rates were 14 patients (4.0%) in VR, 8 (2.8%) in active control conditions, and 27 (15%) in the WL condition. With regard to receiving treatment, patients in a waiting list control condition had greater odds of deteriorating than in the two active conditions, odds ratios (ORs) 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.05, 0.67]. In the case of the socio-demographic variables, none of them were associated with higher or lower odds of deterioration, with the exception of marital status in the WL condition; married people presented a significantly lower probability of deterioration, OR 0.19, 95% CI [0.05, 0.67]. Finally, when comparing pooled effects of VR versus all control conditions, the OR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.31–1.23) in favor of VR, although this result was not statistically significant. This study provides evidence about the deterioration rates of a therapeutic VR approach, showing that the number of deteriorated patients coincides with other therapeutic approaches, and that deterioration is less likely to occur, compared to patients in WL control groups. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Ltd},
keywords = {Adolescent, adult, aged, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, article, demography, deterioration, Deterioration rates, disease association, female, human, Humans, Individual patient data analysis, male, marriage, meta analysis, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, outcome assessment, Probability, psychology, randomized controlled trial (topic), social status, virtual reality, virtual reality exposure therapy, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Ample evidence supports the use of Virtual Reality (VR) for anxiety disorders. Nonetheless, currently there is no evidence about moderators or potential negative effects of VR treatment strategies. An Individual Patient Data (IPD) approach was employed with 15 retrieved datasets. The current study sample was composed of 810 patients. Randomized control trials (RCTs) for each primary outcome measure were performed, in addition to moderator analyses of the socio-demographic variables. Deterioration rates were 14 patients (4.0%) in VR, 8 (2.8%) in active control conditions, and 27 (15%) in the WL condition. With regard to receiving treatment, patients in a waiting list control condition had greater odds of deteriorating than in the two active conditions, odds ratios (ORs) 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.05, 0.67]. In the case of the socio-demographic variables, none of them were associated with higher or lower odds of deterioration, with the exception of marital status in the WL condition; married people presented a significantly lower probability of deterioration, OR 0.19, 95% CI [0.05, 0.67]. Finally, when comparing pooled effects of VR versus all control conditions, the OR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.31–1.23) in favor of VR, although this result was not statistically significant. This study provides evidence about the deterioration rates of a therapeutic VR approach, showing that the number of deteriorated patients coincides with other therapeutic approaches, and that deterioration is less likely to occur, compared to patients in WL control groups. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
4.
Maïano, C.; Coutu, S.; Tracey, D.; Bouchard, S.; Lepage, G.; Morin, A. J. S.; Moullec, G.
Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders among youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis Article de journal
Dans: Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 236, p. 230–242, 2018, ISSN: 01650327, (Publisher: Elsevier B.V.).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: Adolescent, adolescent disease, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Child, childhood disease, Depression, Depressive Disorder, dysthymia, Dysthymic Disorder, female, generalized anxiety disorder, human, Humans, infant, Intellectual Disability, intellectual impairment, Major, major depression, male, meta analysis, Newborn, obsessive compulsive disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Preschool, preschool child, Prevalence, priority journal, psychology, review, systematic review, Young Adult
@article{maiano_prevalence_2018,
title = {Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders among youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis},
author = {C. Maïano and S. Coutu and D. Tracey and S. Bouchard and G. Lepage and A. J. S. Morin and G. Moullec},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85046664327&doi=10.1016%2fj.jad.2018.04.029&partnerID=40&md5=504c552402432a5b6443d07f63170403},
doi = {10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.029},
issn = {01650327},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Affective Disorders},
volume = {236},
pages = {230–242},
abstract = {Background: The purpose of this meta-analytic study was to determine the pooled prevalence estimates of anxiety and depressive disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID) and to assess the extent to which these pooled prevalence rates differed according to studies’ characteristics. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in nine databases and 21 studies, published between 1975 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety and depressive disorders were respectively (a) 5.4% and 2.8% across samples; (b) 1.2% and 0.03% among children; and (c) 7.9% and 1.4% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates for specific subtypes of anxiety disorders ranged from (a) 0.2% to 11.5% across samples; (b) 0.7% to 17.6% among children; and (c) 0.6% to 19.8% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates of dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder were respectively (a) 3.4% and 2.5% across samples; (b) 2.1% and 3.2% among children; and (c) 6.9% and 5.7% among adolescents. Finally, subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder; and combined subtypes of depressive disorders. Limitations: The present findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution given several limitations related to the characteristics of the populations, diagnostic method and sampling method. Conclusion: Findings provide recommendations for future studies investigating psychological disorders among youth with ID, as well as how clinicians and policy makers can improve diagnostic practices and support for youth with ID. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier B.V.},
keywords = {Adolescent, adolescent disease, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Child, childhood disease, Depression, Depressive Disorder, dysthymia, Dysthymic Disorder, female, generalized anxiety disorder, human, Humans, infant, Intellectual Disability, intellectual impairment, Major, major depression, male, meta analysis, Newborn, obsessive compulsive disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Preschool, preschool child, Prevalence, priority journal, psychology, review, systematic review, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Background: The purpose of this meta-analytic study was to determine the pooled prevalence estimates of anxiety and depressive disorders among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID) and to assess the extent to which these pooled prevalence rates differed according to studies’ characteristics. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in nine databases and 21 studies, published between 1975 and 2015, met the inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety and depressive disorders were respectively (a) 5.4% and 2.8% across samples; (b) 1.2% and 0.03% among children; and (c) 7.9% and 1.4% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates for specific subtypes of anxiety disorders ranged from (a) 0.2% to 11.5% across samples; (b) 0.7% to 17.6% among children; and (c) 0.6% to 19.8% among adolescents. Pooled prevalence estimates of dysthymic disorder and major depressive disorder were respectively (a) 3.4% and 2.5% across samples; (b) 2.1% and 3.2% among children; and (c) 6.9% and 5.7% among adolescents. Finally, subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the pooled prevalence estimates of combined subtypes of anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder; and combined subtypes of depressive disorders. Limitations: The present findings of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution given several limitations related to the characteristics of the populations, diagnostic method and sampling method. Conclusion: Findings provide recommendations for future studies investigating psychological disorders among youth with ID, as well as how clinicians and policy makers can improve diagnostic practices and support for youth with ID. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
5.
Bouchard, S.; Pelletier, M. -H.; Gauthier, J. G.; Côté, G.; Laberge, B.
The assessment of panic using self-report: A comprehensive survey of validated instruments Article de journal
Dans: Journal of Anxiety Disorders, vol. 11, no 1, p. 89–111, 1997, ISSN: 08876185, (Publisher: Elsevier Ltd).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: article, clinical trial, cognition, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic value, disease severity, human, meta analysis, panic, psychometry, reliability, self report
@article{bouchard_assessment_1997,
title = {The assessment of panic using self-report: A comprehensive survey of validated instruments},
author = {S. Bouchard and M. -H. Pelletier and J. G. Gauthier and G. Côté and B. Laberge},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0030979168&doi=10.1016%2fS0887-6185%2896%2900037-0&partnerID=40&md5=9ec367a76a073abf6c7716c429120490},
doi = {10.1016/S0887-6185(96)00037-0},
issn = {08876185},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Anxiety Disorders},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {89–111},
abstract = {A repertoire of reliable and valid self-report instruments to assess panic and panic disorder would help both researchers and clinicians. This review presents a description and an analysis of the available instruments. Following a comprehensive search of the literature, 14 instruments with published information on reliability and validity were reviewed. The following information is reported for each instrument: brief description of the instrument and its development, mean and standard deviation for clinical and nonclinical samples, and psychometric properties. Four types of instruments are presented: general assessment and information (n = 2), severity of panic disorder (n = 2), body sensations (n = 2) and cognitive dimensions of panic (n = 8). Overall, it would seem that panic measures have moderate to excellent psychometric qualities. However, the comparison between the instruments is difficult because the amount of empirical support available varies widely from one instrument to the other.},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Ltd},
keywords = {article, clinical trial, cognition, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic value, disease severity, human, meta analysis, panic, psychometry, reliability, self report},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A repertoire of reliable and valid self-report instruments to assess panic and panic disorder would help both researchers and clinicians. This review presents a description and an analysis of the available instruments. Following a comprehensive search of the literature, 14 instruments with published information on reliability and validity were reviewed. The following information is reported for each instrument: brief description of the instrument and its development, mean and standard deviation for clinical and nonclinical samples, and psychometric properties. Four types of instruments are presented: general assessment and information (n = 2), severity of panic disorder (n = 2), body sensations (n = 2) and cognitive dimensions of panic (n = 8). Overall, it would seem that panic measures have moderate to excellent psychometric qualities. However, the comparison between the instruments is difficult because the amount of empirical support available varies widely from one instrument to the other.
6.
Bouchard, S.; Vallières, A.; Roy, M. -A.; Maziade, M.
Cognitive restructuring in the treatment of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A critical analysis Article de journal
Dans: Behavior Therapy, vol. 27, no 2, p. 257–277, 1996, ISSN: 00057894 (ISSN), (Publisher: Elsevier Inc.).
Résumé | Liens | BibTeX | Étiquettes: adult, article, clinical trial, cognitive therapy, delusion, female, hallucination, human, interview, major clinical study, male, meta analysis, methodology, reliability, schizophrenia, treatment outcome
@article{bouchard_cognitive_1996,
title = {Cognitive restructuring in the treatment of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A critical analysis},
author = {S. Bouchard and A. Vallières and M. -A. Roy and M. Maziade},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0029811687&doi=10.1016%2fS0005-7894%2896%2980017-7&partnerID=40&md5=fb9e671ec441d8a3b663bf48e7bfd0e8},
doi = {10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80017-7},
issn = {00057894 (ISSN)},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
journal = {Behavior Therapy},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
pages = {257–277},
abstract = {This article reviews the 15 empirical studies that have used cognitive restructuring in the treatment of schizophrenia, more specifically for psychotic symptoms (delusions and hallucinations). Three elements are considered before investigating its effectiveness: (a) if subjects are reliably diagnosed with schizophrenia with chronic course and severe impairment; (b) if psychotic symptoms are adequately measured; and (c) if designs are methodologically sound. Our investigation revealed that schizophrenia is not reliably diagnosed and severity is low to moderate. Assessment of psychotic symptoms is satisfactory, but assessment of generalization to other areas is limited. Only five studies possess reliable design and are performed with schizophrenia subjects. These studies suggest that cognitive restructuring is effective to reduce or eliminate hallucinations or delusions in schizophrenia patients.},
note = {Publisher: Elsevier Inc.},
keywords = {adult, article, clinical trial, cognitive therapy, delusion, female, hallucination, human, interview, major clinical study, male, meta analysis, methodology, reliability, schizophrenia, treatment outcome},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article reviews the 15 empirical studies that have used cognitive restructuring in the treatment of schizophrenia, more specifically for psychotic symptoms (delusions and hallucinations). Three elements are considered before investigating its effectiveness: (a) if subjects are reliably diagnosed with schizophrenia with chronic course and severe impairment; (b) if psychotic symptoms are adequately measured; and (c) if designs are methodologically sound. Our investigation revealed that schizophrenia is not reliably diagnosed and severity is low to moderate. Assessment of psychotic symptoms is satisfactory, but assessment of generalization to other areas is limited. Only five studies possess reliable design and are performed with schizophrenia subjects. These studies suggest that cognitive restructuring is effective to reduce or eliminate hallucinations or delusions in schizophrenia patients.