@article{dugas_behavioral_2022,

title = {Behavioral Experiments for Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Randomized Clinical Trial for Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder},

author = {M. J. Dugas and K. A. Sexton and E. A. Hebert and S. Bouchard and J. -P. Gouin and R. Shafran},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133178888&doi=10.1016%2fj.beth.2022.05.003&partnerID=40&md5=4dd15547cbef29c5f1adc84169176c53},

doi = {10.1016/j.beth.2022.05.003},

issn = {00057894 (ISSN)},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-01-01},

journal = {Behavior Therapy},

volume = {53},

number = {6},

pages = {1147–1160},

abstract = {Sophisticated multicomponent treatments for adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) have been developed over the past three decades. Although these comprehensive treatments have produced encouraging results, they appear to be less efficacious than treatments for other anxiety disorders. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test a newly developed, highly focused treatment for adults with GAD: Behavioral Experiments for Intolerance of Uncertainty. Sixty (60) participants (51 women, 9 men), with a mean age of 34.60 years (range: 19 to 67 years), were randomized to either treatment (n = 30) or wait-list control (n = 30). Treatment consisted of 12 weekly 1-hour sessions in which participants learned to use behavioral experiments to test their catastrophic beliefs about uncertainty. Assessments were conducted at pre-, mid- and postcondition, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome was the severity of GAD, and secondary outcomes were worry, depression, somatic anxiety, and intolerance of uncertainty. Using growth curve modeling, we found that (1) the treatment group was superior to the wait-list group in terms of change from pre- to posttest on all outcomes; (2) the combined sample (once wait-listed participants received treatment) evidenced large and significant decreases on all outcomes; and (3) treatment gains were either maintained or increased over the 12-month follow-up period of the study. The new treatment is a promising treatment option for adults with GAD considering that it may be as efficacious as more comprehensive evidence-based psychological treatments for GAD. © 2022},

note = {Publisher: Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {adult, aged, antidepressant agent, Anxiety, Anxiety disorder, Anxiety Disorders, anxiolytic agent, article, behavior assessment, behavioral experiments, benzodiazepine, cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive vulnerability, Cognitive-behavioral treatment, confusion (uncertainty), controlled study, dependent variable, Depression, disease severity, female, follow up, generalized anxiety disorder, growth curve, human, Humans, intolerance of uncertainty, major clinical study, male, mental disease, outcome assessment, patient worry, procedures, psychology, randomized controlled trial, uncertainty},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{chretien_cognitive_2017,

title = {Cognitive restructuring of gambling-related thoughts: A systematic review},

author = {M. Chrétien and I. Giroux and A. Goulet and C. Jacques and S. Bouchard},

url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85024477584&doi=10.1016%2fj.addbeh.2017.07.001&partnerID=40&md5=77a066c286d78d0e401757c44a13b9af},

doi = {10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.001},

issn = {03064603 (ISSN)},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

journal = {Addictive Behaviors},

volume = {75},

pages = {108–121},

abstract = {Gamblers' thoughts have a fundamental influence on their gambling problem. Cognitive restructuring is the intervention of choice to correct those thoughts. However, certain difficulties are noted in the application of cognitive restructuring techniques and the comprehension of their guidelines. Furthermore, the increase of skill game players (e.g. poker) entering treatment creates a challenge for therapists, as these gamblers present with different thoughts than those of the gamblers usually encountered in treatment (e.g. chance-only games like electronic gambling machines). This systematic review aims to describe how cognitive restructuring is carried out with gamblers based on the evidence available in empirical studies that include cognitive interventions for gambling. Of the 2607 studies collected, 39 were retained. The results highlight exposure as the most frequently used technique to facilitate identification of gambling-related thoughts (imaginal = 28.2%; in vivo = 10.3%). More than half of the studies (69.2%) clearly reported therapeutic techniques aimed to correct gamblers' thoughts, of which 37% involved visual support to challenge those thoughts (e.g. ABC log). Of the 39 studies retained, 48.7% included skill game players (i.e., poker, blackjack, sports betting) in their sample. However, none of these studies mentioned whether cognitive restructuring had been adapted for these gamblers. Several terms referring to gamblers' thoughts were used interchangeably (e.g. erroneous, dysfunctional or inadequate thoughts), although each of these terms could refer to specific content. Clinical implications of the results are discussed with regard to the needs of therapists. This review also suggests recommendations for future research. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd},

note = {Publisher: Elsevier Ltd},

keywords = {behavior change, cognition, Cognitive distortions, cognitive restructuring, Cognitive techniques, cognitive therapy, Cognitive-behavioral treatment, empiricism, Gambling, Gambling treatment, human, Humans, methodology, nomenclature, pathological gambling, procedures, psychology, review, sport, systematic review, Therapy, Thinking},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}